Home

 TV Shows

 Behind the Scenes

Contact Details

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

Organised by the International Academy of Television and Radio, Russia, the conference gave leading media  and security  professionals a chance to interact and contemplate the subject.

The setting for the conference was the Alrosa resort at the beautiful Black Sea coast town of Gelenjik.

 

Terrorism And Electronic Mass Media

The reason why this conference was so relevant to our times is because it studied the interaction between the two areas that have greatly influenced  and affected the human race in recent times - television and  terrorism.

Today - with younger people reading less and watching television more, newspaper readers much preferring seeing the news makers and situations with their own eyes and even illiterate people in far flung corners of the world being covered by a TV signal - the influence television has on people is growing at an unprecedented pace. Terrorism has also grown and spread and some argue that it is publicity that terrorism thrives on !

The delegates at the conference took a long and hard look at various real life situations that were put forward as case studies and first hand experiences were shared.

The questions that took centre stage were : How much information should the public be given ? When should the information be given ? And most important of all, who will decide on the first two questions ?

 

 
 

 

Remarks by Vickram Bahl, Editor in Chief ITMN, at the conference on whether media should report on terrorist attacks independently as it may compromise the security forces and their plans :

Sir, in my opinion the issue at hand is really one of Command Decisions. The heads of both organisations - the security force as well as the media organisation - need to take command decisions based on the information available to them at the time. In case they take a wrong decision, it could lead to a loss of innocent lives in many cases. For example, if the security chief decides to storm a hostage situation, his command decision is based on the information available and his professional training. However, we must not forget that he is taking the decision on a balance of probabilities. Similarly, the decision to transmit on TV a highjack or hostage story , especially in the live mode, can compromise an ongoing operation by feeding sensitive information to the terrorists in case they have a television tuned in or contact with some ally that does. Understanding the effects of  breaking a story is as important to an editor as predicting the outcome of a storming is for the security chief.

However, they both have independent jobs and are both answerable to the law in case of professional negligence or misconduct.  It is not desirable in a democracy for the security forces to have the electronic media work on their instructions. That would, in fact, make the security chief the editor in chief !

In order to retain the fine balance of a democracy this freedom is vital. However, accountability is also important and in case of deliberate actions causing loss of life or breech of national security or even gross negligence, the law has provisions to bring action against the erring party, be it the editor or the security chief.

While I am not saying that the editor should not consult the security chief on ongoing operations if he feels that his story may jeopardize an operation, I am opposed to having that consultation as binding on the editor. His actions should be independent and he should be responsible for them. I feel that the security forces can be as secretive as they want and that is their job; getting the news to the public domain is the job of a journalist and he must do it, responsibly !

We, Sir, as media professionals need to take these command decisions everyday.

 

 
 
 

Home I TV Shows I Behind the Scenes I Contact Details